Rob Eagle:
I remember having to learn all this braking distance stuff from the Highway Code, but how many can really visualise how far 175 feet is? I certainly can't.
Also hasn't all the differences and advances in road stone, tyre rubber and braking systems rendered all this pretty useless? In fact do they still expect learners to know this anymore?
I am inclined to agree, Rob, stopping distances are largely academic. It is not easy to visualise distances without definite visual guides. More useful is the "two-second rule". It is easy to estimate two seconds - about the time it takes to say, "Only a fool breaks the two-second rule."
Have braking distances improved over time? I am not so sure. However good the driver or the brakes, ultimately it depends on the coefficient of friction between rubber and asphalt. Since this is a fairly innate physical feature, my guess is that it has not improved by much. I should be very interested if anyone has any reliable data on this. It is probably sensible to stick to the long-established figures for braking to stay on the safe side.
Learners are expected to familiarise themselves with all of the Highway Code. I don't know whether they are tested on stopping distances on the theory test - does anyone on this forum know?
Rob Eagle:
The 2 second rule was pure thinking outside the box genius, simple to understand, simple to implement and effective.
Out of the box indeed! It is a case of what drivers can easily observe and understand. But let's get back to the topic - speed limits and observation. And to take a line from the initial post:
How do different countries tackle speeding on their roads? What could we learn from them?
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site