Log in to the online community
Follow on question is if I have no CPC on lighting circuit, but have all class 2 fittings (lights and switches) and warning on consumer unit, is that a C3?
Difficult to see how the installation of a new CU would not involve at least some testing, but it may not strictly be evidence of inspection. Ideally, there would be an EICR prior to a CU replacement so that any peripheral defects could be remedied. The answer really is, "it depends".
As for lighting circuits with no CPC, the subject has been discussed here fairly recently. If you use the search facility, you may find the answer that you want. (Again, opinions differ.)
The government's guidance https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/electrical-safety-standards-in-the-private-rented-sector-guidance-for-landlords-tenants-and-local-authorities/guide-for-landlords-electrical-safety-standards-in-the-private-rented-sector is that an EIC is appropriate "If a property is newly built or has been completely rewired".
Granted a CU replacement often results in a fair amount of inspection and testing of the existing installation - and often people will recommend carrying out a full inspection and test of the existing installation before performing a CU change to ensure there aren't any nasty surprises that'll result in problems with the new CU (nuisance tripping due to pre-existing faults etc.) but you really need the paperwork to show that was the case.
So in my view this measure for protection cannot be used in rented premises. So C2 for me. We all know that tenants will change light fittings and replace plastic switches with metallic light fittings and metal dimmer switches.
Duty Holder is required to have a report and that the electrical installation is safe for the tenants.So to JSteele are you just not wanting to spend the money on a EICR being carried out? or do you already know that there are defects/issues and thats going to be more costly and disruptive and you are happy to standby the 5yrs on the EIC.
In terms of the lighting with no CPC, I had a look at previous posts and I see what you mean about opinions differing! Given the disruption, I will look at sorting this once the current tenant moves out. We have been clear with the tenant that light fittings can't be changed and we check them during inspection visits.
Or is the issuing electrician happy to provide an inspection report cover sheet to go with his existing results?
No to both suggests a complete inspection was not carried out, just a new CU stuck on the end of old wires.
Re the lights.
There really should not be that many good installations left without an earth ( sometimes called CPC Circuit Protective Conductor) in the lighting - after all the requirement for this became compulsory in 1966. Is the rest of the installation from that era, and more than 54 years old ?
That said, if it has been well looked after, it may still be in good condition for a few more years.
This is the most recent similar discussion I can find.
It is fair to say opinion is divided on the interpretation of these relatively new rules. Even if you can rent it out for now on the back of the EIC, set aside the rewire money, as you will need it in a few years.
Not trying to get away with hiding issues as such. The consumer unit was installed only after I asked the electrician to inspect the electrics - and at that point he said to upgrade it, along with running ring to the kitchen. He then issued an EIC (at that time, I assumed that was the same as an inspection certificate). He said he inspected everything (the EIC had a part 9 which is a schedule of items inspected, with most items ticked unless there was an "N/A" such as for 6.1b PELV system including the source and associated circuits ).
But given the guidance above etc, sounds like it makes sense to get an EICR to be sure.
Assuming it is not a copy and paste error, those results show the lights, both up and down, are wired with modern metric cables with an earth, and the '0.8' and '0.9' "R1+ R2" are the results of loop-back resisance checks verifying the earth continuity to the far end of that wiring, so you do have a CPC. Or if you really don't it is just possible you were sent someone else's form by mistake, I suppose. Is your tenant or their agent happy with that format ?
The EIC was for a different property where there is CPC, but no EICR.
Inspection would involve unscrewing at least a sample of sockets, ceiling roses and light switches to have a look behind. That may or may not have been undertaken prior to the CU change. However, the posting above suggests that the process started with a PIR and then moved on to remedial work, which has been certified. Taking a broad view, in my opinion, the EIC is good for 5 years.
Yes - I asked him to inspect, and his inspection resulted in a the recommendation of changing the CU. Interestingly he didn't issue me with an Inspection Report, only the EIC after the remedial work was done.