4 minute read time.
A more diverse workforce can make companies more profitable. But there’s still a lot to do to make it happen.

be8604c64490227d4e551d29e89d3288-huge-women-in-engineering.jpg

 There has been a lot of commentary about the lack of women in STEM generally and in engineering particularly – but I want to look at the root causes. 


Firstly, we know there is a demand for more female engineers. We know that the UK engineering sector has a skills shortage, leading to a huge talent crunch which will inevitably affect the delivery of projects worth billions of pounds. So we know we need more skilled engineers.  We also know that by not attracting workers from 50% of the population can only be detrimental – not just to companies, but to the wider community. 


So what are the reasons for this? I wanted to get an idea of what the root causes were and what stakeholders could do about them. I asked speakers from the forthcoming Women In Engineering event which celebrates the Year of Engineering and marks INWED in June.

Early Root Causes

Having a better understanding of why there aren’t enough women in engineering or enough girls interested in STEM will allow employers and other stakeholders to overcome the challenge. 


It is generally recognised that barriers begin at an early stage with unconscious reinforcement of gender bias.  These influences range from the type of toys marketed to boys and girls to the images they see in popular children’s TV programmes.  


As Mivy James, National Security Head of Consulting at BAE Systems pointed out:

 

“It’s been proven that gender stereotypes still constrain the choices that both boys and girls make with regards to their interests. No matter how hard parents try, children are bombarded with gender stereotypes in books, advertising, toy shop displays and their peers.”





These impactful stereotypes are perpetuated throughout pre-school and school years, so by the time children are in primary stage they are already heavily influenced. And it doesn’t stop there. “Maths and science is socialised as a ‘boy’ thing and this can put many highly capable girls off these subjects”, Richard Chapman-Harris, Group Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Manager at Mott MacDonald added. 


Between school and higher education, the challenges remain and become expanded, as noted by Sue Ferns, Senior Deputy General Secretary at Prospect, who said:

 

“As girls progress through their education, they are increasingly likely to find themselves in a student minority – which can be isolating and demoralising.” 





By the time they are starting their careers, a lot of girls will have been dissuaded (consciously or unconsciously) away from engineering.

58d4e16e8b9aad35817a2b3d3122acd0-huge-young-girl.jpgEarly Solutions

If we know these root causes are at an early stage of children’s development, could the solutions also be there? Of course they are. Children respond well to images and the image of what engineers do, and what engineering is, can impact their career choices later on. However, as Gareth Jones, Engineering & Technology Director at Rolls Royce pointed out, this can be changed, “The image or perception of engineering in the UK doesn’t do it justice. But we can have STEM programmes that engage school pupils from a young age; we can target teachers and parents as they have a big influence on children’s perceptions. Additionally, engineering companies can reach out to local schools and interact with the teacher population to better inform them too.”


Engagement with school children to positively influence their awareness of engineering is important – and everyone can play their part; from teachers to parents to employers. “We have to start engaging with girls at an early age. Gender stereotyping is often cemented into the way a young person thinks by the age of 7 and so we need to start connecting with girls before this. Raising awareness is key, but even better is providing role models. The more visible we can make positive engineering role models, the more chance we have of showing the future pipeline that engineering is open to all.”, commented Maya Kolaska, Business Consultant from BAE Systems.


The reality is that we need to start early to raise awareness of engineering to young girls, limiting down the bias they will face and building up their confidence in themselves and their career choices. I recognise there are other reasons to why there aren’t enough women in engineering or girls interested in STEM (careers paths, gender pay gap, culture etc), but I think these challenges (in employment) are predicated on the challenges faced by girls at an earlier stage. 


It is at this stage where the biggest challenges remain, but also the most impactful solutions lie.

Riad Mannan
Events Portfolio Development Manager, The IET

 

The IET’s Women in Engineering event takes place on Friday, 22 June 2018 in Birmingham.
Tickets are available from: www.theiet.org/women-in-engineering

Women in Engineering Conference and Workshops










 

  • James Shaw has an interesting take on this. Apparently, Women in Engineering is a communist plot to stop women having babies. He then goes on to imply (by comparison to baseball players) than women are intrinsically unsuited to be engineers. Finally, he doesn’t like diversity. Like any other profession, engineering should reflect the community it serves. Unless, of course, he would rather stop women driving, flying planes, using computers, etc. After all, they must be busy with all those babies.
  • "Firstly, we know there is a demand for more female engineers. ... We also know that by not attracting workers from 50% of the population can only be detrimental – not just to companies, but to the wider community." If there is a demand for more female engineers then it is driven by a collectivist socio-political ideology, an ideology that at its root is anti-rational and ultimately hopes to achieve the destruction of Western civilisation. This is an ideology that has managed to attract many helpers, innocent of its goal, under the supposedly benign banner of equality. Women have a unique role in society, they are the only sex that can have babies, so anything that can be done to prevent this furthers 'progress' towards the goal of societal destruction, and, I must admit they are doing a good job. Not only is the fertility of Western women declining but when they do get pregnant 20% of those pregnancies lead to an abortion. In the UK that amounts to close to 200,000 per year, remarkably similar to the size of the replacement population that we are now importing each year. The idea that companies should attempt to recruit from the 50% of the population that don't traditionally go on to be engineers isn't obviously 'a good thing'; if all leading basketball players are from the upper height quartile would it make sense to try and recruit from the lower height quartile? In what way would it be good for companies if engineering went the way of medicine where more than 60% of doctors in training are women, a profession now experiencing a 'GP crisis' as the women either choose to work part-time or are part of the four in ten that quit before thay are 35? "A more diverse workforce can make companies more profitable. But there’s still a lot to do to make it happen". I struggle to make sense of this. The whole 'women in engineering' argument is predicated on the doctrine that 'men and women are the same (but women are better)'. So we take a set of men and women that have an identical upbringing, identical schooling and identical training yet hope to achieve a diversity of outcome? What organisations and societies need is a diversity of opinion, which is the exact opposite of what the 'equality of outcome' movement is all about. I suggest that what individual people need is the freedom to make their own choices in life and if some of those people are women that have an apptitude for engineering and they take up that profession then good for them. What we most certainly don't need are a bunch of collectivists and their useful helpers trying remake society by quota. What comes next, directed labour to Tractor Factory 39A? We have been there and it doesn't work.